It further held that to the extent the Oklahoma statutes denied him admission they were unconstitutional and void. Our society grows increasingly complex, and our need for trained leaders increases correspondingly. In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts decision. AFRICAN AMERICANS, BROOKSVILLE, CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, ROSCOE DUNJEE, ADA LOIS SIPUEL FISHER, AMOS T. HALL, NAACP, SEGREGATION, UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. U.S. Reports: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. In response, legislators in Oklahoma amended the statute, permitting African Americans to be admitted to educational institutions provided that the instruction the institutions provided was upon a segregated basis. The student was then admitted to the graduate school of the University of Oklahoma, a state-funded institution. WebBoard of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U.S. 631; cf. Dist.) But they signify that the State, in administering the facilities it affords for professional and graduate study, sets McLaurin apart from the other students. The case concerned a Black student who was treated differently than white students after being admitted to the graduate school at the University of Oklahoma. - Discoveries, Timeline & Facts, Presidential Election of 1848: Summary, Candidates & Results, Lord Charles Cornwallis: Facts, Biography & Quotes, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand: Quotes & Biography, Who is Jose de San Martin? Decided June 5, 1950. WebMcLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents 2,513 views Jul 7, 2016 29 Dislike Share Save OU IACH 2.33K subscribers In this lecture, professor Kathryn Schumaker reviews the Get free summaries of new US Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! McLaurin v 87 F. Supp. Appellant filed a complaint requesting injunctive relief, alleging that the action of the school authorities and the statutes upon which their action was based were unconstitutional and deprived him of the equal protection of the laws. 1149 *637 **852 No part of this site may be construed as in the public domain. I feel like its a lifeline. Brianna has her undergraduate degree in English Education and her master's degree in Urban Education. Dictionary of American Family Names Patrick Hanks 2003, 2006. Decided June 5, 1950. Can a state treat a student differently from other students solely because of race? 0000005065 00000 n In apparent conformity with the amendment, his admission was made subject to "such rules and regulations as to segregation as the President of the University shall consider to afford to Mr. G. W. McLaurin substantially equal educational opportunities as are afforded to other persons seeking the same education in the Graduate College," a condition which does not appear to have been withdrawn. To read more about the impact of McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents click here. Where conditions exist where a student of color is required to receive his education deprive him of his personal and present right to the equal protection of the laws such circumstances the, Reversing, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state could not treat a student differently from other students on the basis of race as the, Don't Miss Important Points of Law with BARBRI Outlines (Login Required). 87 F. Supp. Their own education and development will necessarily suffer to the extent that his training is unequal to that of his classmates. On the assumption, however, that the State would follow the constitutional mandate, the court refused to grant the injunction, retaining jurisdiction of the cause with full power to issue any necessary and proper orders to secure McLaurin the equal protection of the laws. Appellant, having been admitted to a state-supported graduate school, must receive the same treatment at the hands of the state as students of other races. At the time, an Oklahoma law made it a misdemeanor to operate, teach at, or attend an educational institution that admitted both white and black students. External Relations: Moira Delaney Hannah Nelson Caroline Presnell Please select which sections you would like to print: Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. For some time, the section of the classroom in which appellant sat was surrounded by a rail on which there was a sign stating, Reserved For Colored, but these have been removed. McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION et al. We hold that under these circumstances the Fourteenth Amendment precludes differences in treatment by the state based upon race. At that time, his application was denied, solely because of his race. Where conditions exist where a student of color is required to receive his education deprive him of his personal and present right to the equal protection of the laws such circumstances theFourteenth Amendmentprecludes differences in treatment by the state based upon race. McLaurin appealed to the United States Supreme Court on the basis that he was being denied equal protection under the 14th Amendment. . The result was that he was handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction. But at the very least, the state will not be depriving appellant of the opportunity to secure acceptance by his fellow students on his own merits. Plessy v. Ferguson The federal court in Oklahoma City upheld the discrimination, observing that the Constitution "does not abolish distinctions based upon race . his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession." In 1948, McLaurin applied for admission to the doctoral program in the College of Education, directly challenging the states current segregation laws. v McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents - casetext.com . These restrictions were obviously imposed in order to comply, as nearly as could be, with the statutory requirements of Oklahoma. Argued April 3-4, 1950. Both students sued, and the U.S. Their own education and development will necessarily suffer to the extent that his training is unequal to that of his classmates. 455. 638-642. In this case, the Court found that the State of Oklahoma had set the plaintiff student apart from the other students. This segregated him from his classmates and made group learning and discussions impossible. In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Louis Powell, the Court held that the trial court erred when it failed to consider mitigating evidence of Eddings unhappy childhood and emotional disturbance. Such restrictions impaired and inhibited his ability to study, to engage in discussions, exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession. No. The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, Oklahoma Heritage Preservation Grant Program. Those who will come under his guidance and influence must be directly affected by the education he receives. The proceedings below are stated in the opinion. The following (as per The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition) is the preferred citation for articles:Alfred L. Brophy, McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950), The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=MC034. Linda Joan Pitts (19451977) FamilySearch The Supreme Court reasoned that, under the Fourteenth Amendments equal protection clause, state officials had the legal duty to treat the plaintiff in the same manner as students of other races. For the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged that the fabric of American society was changing. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant filed a complaint requesting injunctive relief, alleging that the action of the school authorities and the statutes upon which their action was based were unconstitutional and deprived him [339 U.S. 637, 639] of the equal protection of the laws. This we think irrelevant. These factors are elemental to robust education. Our society grows increasingly complex, and our need for trained leaders increases correspondingly. Accordingly, the high court reversed the decision of the U.S. District Court, requiring the University of Oklahoma to remove the restrictions under which McLaurin was attending the institution. McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents - Ballotpedia As a result, much of the South adopted "separate but equal" policies that governed daily life. (1950) McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents - blackpast.org In McLaurin, the Supreme Court found that an African-American student should be admitted to a white graduate school, and be treated like other students, because of the importance of his "ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and in general to learn his profession.". Following this decision, the Oklahoma legislature amended these statutes to permit the admission of Negroes to institutions of higher learning attended by white students, in cases where such institutions offered courses not available in the Negro schools. He is now assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for colored students; he is assigned to a table in the library on the main floor; and he is permitted to eat at the same time in the cafeteria as other students, although here again he is assigned to a special table. While McLaurin argued that the University of Oklahoma was violating the equal protection clause under the 14th Amendment, the university argued that they were not violating McLaurin's rights. The U.S. Supreme Court heard McLaurin's appeal in April 1950 and in June unanimously reversed the lower court. In the interval between the decision of the court below and the hearing in this Court, the treatment afforded appellant was altered. Therefore, the Court ruled that higher institutions such as colleges and universities were prohibited from practicing segregation, as it violated equal protection in an educational setting. George McLaurin, Educator born McLaurin successfully sued in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma to gain admission to the institution (87 F. Supp. This page was last edited on 18 March 2023, at 15:55.
Chesterfield Sc Election Results,
Who Is Kirstie Stanway Married To,
The Fillmore Philadelphia Covid,
Fr Matthew Munoz Diocese Of Orange,
Articles M
mclaurin v oklahoma summary