Free Patricia Rorrer - Facebook Mal told Keith Morrison that Patricias dance teacher originally confirmed her alibi that she was in class on the day of the murder, then changed his mind. which makes a complete nonsense of their gun theory. Counsel for Patricia Rorrer, 52, argued in Lehigh County Court that investigators mishandled DNA evidence, WFMZ-TV 69 reports. I can't believe this bitch has a whole internet community rallying for her; have they SEEN the evidence? And she would just call out of the blue., According to the Free Patricia Rorrer page on Facebook:I called him to let him know that I was going to the USA finals for a horse show. Shes still guilty, with her hands did it or not, in regard to baby Alex. Narcissistic and violent tendencies are very common. Pal stays true. LONGTIME SUSPECT CHARGED IN MURDERS\ - Greensboro News and Record Keep in mind that 34 hairs are in custody of the state police, so where are the other 4 hairs? Patricia Rorrer: The Hang Up: Directed by Joe Berlinger, Catharine Park. Under supervision of a doctor, 39 hair specimens were removed, recorded and logged. I was able to email with Patricia via the PrisonConnect platform around Christmastime. Still, no good leads materialized. The criminal, a crazy with a psychotic crush on a man, the planner a individual with a lot of self esteem and narcissistic charm who can persuade women, was rich thought compared to the individual in this case, and the victim, a woman who saw her life only as a wife and mother and had no other pretensions, and that even if she had threatened the individual that she would leave a few times, she always stayed. She had money put aside. Interesting thought about the alibi timing. Go watch the Reasonable Doubt episode from last night Patricia did it. Andrew described his existence with Joanne and Alex as a little Camelot., Ex-spouse off list. After one bullet didnt kill Joann, the gun locked up, so Patricia had to beat her to death, according to the prosecution. Book her. This video is currently unavailable. Another inaccuracy in this is, they state the jury took SIX HOURS to return a verdict, when in fact it took less than TWO HOURS. I cant lose them, he told the media. Several instances of malpractice, along with revelations have emerged since her incarceration namely, failing to forensically examine significant items of evidence items which would have seriously compromised their case had they been examined and failing to advise Rorrers Defence of witnesses who were prepared to testify on her behalf. Shame on your for defending a vicious killer. Patricia and her husband broke up after the babys death. Its true that women were more idiots than about men, they had the impression that if they caught a fool to take them as wives, they would settle for life, even today we see that but more diluted, still an exaggerated reason for murder. If not, how could Andrew have obtained samples of Patricias hair if they apparently didnt meet up in person after Andrews marriage? Once, when a gun-wielding farmer and his buddy caught Patricia and Gary riding motorcycles on his field, Patricia walked up and got in their faces and argued, Gary recalled to the Morning Call. Were suppose to ignore the actual forensic evidence and forensic opinions because we were told that a cop overheard her claiming she confessed? What a lame article. Rorrer has appealed her conviction several times and her supporters believe additional DNA. I am reliably informed they took SIX hours, not TWO as stated in my comment. Flaw in reasoning. Also why if beaten with a gun or with whatever, why was there no blood on the clothing? Just consider all your nasty posts about others opinions and learn to attack the argument, not the arguer with insults. Hoist by my own petard! The Free Patricia Rorrer page responds to comments from supporters (How is this even possible that this woman is still in jail?!? But hang on You ask that I show care with my wording and show all the tolerance in the world, and by that you presumably mean I should simply ignore those who villify her in the most disgraceful way, probably in the opinion that all readers of their comments will agree, and no one is going to take offence! Having watched and read all that has been available, I feel very strongly, that a grave error has been perpetrated by the law authorities. It might have said no root but could have been wrong. Oh, and she was so obsessed with him that she started dating and found herself a boyfriend that was not only younger, but much more attractive than Andy? Joanne and Alex didnt disappear until 12/15. In summer, after thawing, there will be small animals eating the body and even turkey vultures, but not so much in the winter. No explanation given. Patricia defaulted on her mortgage and then returned to North Carolina, where she eventually moved in with a boyfriend named Brian Ward. But thats just some of the ammo on Team Patricias battleship. Unbloody vehicle. Together they had a baby girl, Nicole. They did this case on Reasonable Doubt last night. She took out the woman who replaced her. Patricia Rorrer: Under the Microscope. Those who knew Joann pointed out that she didnt like to drive in reverse and would have never parked that way. Hair we go. Patricia Rorrer will burn in hell, as she should. Someone had shot Joann in the face with a .22-caliber pistol, then beaten her about the head hitting her 19 times in all with a blunt object. Patricia had a violent past and was absolutely positively the killer. And in a piece of salacious testimony, Patricia Rorrers half sister, Sandra Ireland, said that in May 1995, about six months after the murder, their mother, Patricia Chambers, stopped by the house and asked her to hold onto or hide a gun, or both. But I suppose you havent a clue about that. How would an intruder find it? The Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Networks website also points to a bombshell: In 2015, the Justice Department acknowledged that most of the team members from an FBI microscopic hair comparison unit gave prosecutors flawed data from 1980 to 2000 that could have unjustly contributed to a number convictions including Patricia Rorrers. There are judges, eminent lawyers and writers who are in support of her. He would be alive today if it were not for Patricia Rorrer. The mild-mannered Sarah died in 2019 at the age of 83. Watching this case on tv again today, I returned to this site and noted: I most definitely will not personally afford Patricia a platform, Michael said in an email to ForensicFilesNow.com She had her chance to answer my questions and tell her story in court over 20 years ago. Pat will spend the rest of her natural life in prison where people like her belong. New state, new man. Rorrer is as guilty as OJ Simpson. So, if you feel you have to be critical of me, you should also bear in mind those hate-mongers and perhaps have a word with them too. I expect she will admit it one day. He is the guilty one. SHAME ON THEM. Murder in Lehigh Valley: Keith Morrison Reports is also available on YouTube, but it costs $1.99 to view (Keith comes off as an advocate for Patricias innocence on the episode). As for Joanns parents, her father died a year after the murder. If you want to help her let her find peace by admitting her wrong and asking God for forgiveness. As I stated previously, if she cannot speak for herself, Im happy to step up on her behalf. Police believe Rorrer abducted and killed her ex-boyfriend's wife and infant son in Pennsylvania. (We didnt get into the specifics.). I believe in Patricias innocence and she deserves to be freed, at last! Look into it. DA readily agreed they did not belong to Rorrer, was happy to admit they were never submitted for analysis. They had a son, Alex Martin, in August of 1994. Why would it be an irony for a person to express his opinion? in tandem with no evidence of home invasion. For this week, I looked into the defenders reasoning as well as Patricias whereabouts today. If you look at the crime scene picture, only parts of the mother seem preserved. This article seems to have a great many errors and omissions, more by design, I fancy, than a need to tell the story objectively. Hardly an argument, more a figment of your overconfidence in your opinion. Other loyal friends and associates attested to Patricias kindness toward horses and devotion to her daughter, whom she took along as she worked in stables. What definition? False. A documentary on Youtube Judges for Justice shows a clear case of evidence tampering with regard to the hair. So, lets take your response one step at a time. Am I missing something? Sadly, those who defend Rorrer do not want to be confused by the truth. They found several specimens but not a single one was a match. Or the ME and the entomologist that explained how impossible it would be for that baby and mother to be out there for four months, deceased at that, and still be as intact as they were, and the fact that the baby was double the size of a three month old child. She was bubbly and likable, not disgruntled, according to friend Kathy Barber, who visited her friend in jail. Stop. The fat cow is guilty as hell and I hope she continues to have the shit kicked out of her in prison every day of her useless life. I really never thought of it again.. After reading this forum and hearing the details of this case, Iowa sure seems a lot fairer in my eyes. The couple moved into Andrews sturdy brick house at 740 Front Street in Catasauqua, Pennsylvania. However, that first theory very neatly allows the cops to further theorise that the gun she once owned (which had a history of jamming after the first shot) was the one used at the murder. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence.. The media love the femme fatale., FBI lab blunder. More likely it reflects a relative reluctance to execute females as well as the pendency of what will be the last episode of DNA investigation. The attorney, Craig Neely, also argues he has the testimony of a. There are those on this very site who express their disappointment she was not executed. RR, Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube. And finally, your supercilious comment about Speculative lies Ive perused my previous comments and at no point do I see those words! Why would she say that maybe she wasnt really a good friend, just someone trying to inject herself into a super sensational case. She likely SUFFOCATED him to get revenge on the babys father who was planning on leaving her. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. What time will shops open on Sunday 27th Dec 2020 Patricia Rorrer was convicted of both deaths in the mid-90's and is serving a life sentence. Its a video on Utube Judges For Justice featuring her case. Youre right about my comments on other sites, but those seem to have an abundance of hate-mongers who feel no need to mince their words hence my retorts to those. Rorrer seems to have had relatively considerable appeals scrutiny of the convicting evidence, to no avail as yet. But Im sure that was just a coincidence LOL. You, however seem to have no problem with these hurtful and damaging comments aimed at Rorrer. I thought the same. In a million years, she wouldnt do anything to harm that.. It wasnt aimed at any one video producer. Assuming Mr K didnt have a cast-iron alibi, I imagine the resistance to his notional perpetration is his not only killing his baby but leaving him to suffer horribly (of exposure) first, when there was no evidence of his mental dysfunction nor motive of pecuniary gain (as far as I know). To be sure, an appellant does not have to *prove* (convince) of innocence to have been wrongfully convicted (even if they are in fact guilty but I digress). But her reputation wasnt exactly sleek and shiny. I noticed that her defense lawyer and others advocating for her is not mentioning more about the gun. I would very much be interested in any comment you can offer in response to my input here. That phone call came in on December 7, 1994. Its an opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. Andrew also stated that when Pat called and Joann answered she had instructed her not to call again because they were married and they were happy. Where is Patricia Rorrer Now? - The Cinemaholic Patricias defenders also say Andrew Katrinak staged the scene at his house by prying the door and cutting the phone line. Microconidia DNA, as long as the strand is one inch long they can pull the DNA from that. Theres something very important to this case that needs to be mentioned more than anything else THE GUN. After . Patricia Rorrer was tried and convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of kidnapping in March 1998, in Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, for the murder of Joanne Katrinak and her infant son. Prosecutor pounds away. Highly charged case. If the answer is no, enough said! Wrong Man Season 2 Release Date Confirmed (Exclusive) And for you to even ask why documentaries are biased, makes me wonder if you have the ability to determine fact from fiction! I believe this woman murdered Joann and Alex. BROADCASTING SPECULATIVE SCENES, SUCH AS MENTIONED ABOVE, CAN LEAVE A VERY INDELIBLE MEMORY ON THOSE WHO ARE HAPPY TO REMAIN GULLIBLE. I dont think so. . . Yes, documentaries probably do misrepresent evidence, and many may respond to that misrepresentation, but beneath that is jury judgment, and while courts can be wrong they are usually right. His hair (back in 94-95) was dirty blonde and roughly 8 inches long. PATRICIA RORRER, : : Petitioner : v. : CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 19-01398 : WENDY K. NICHOLAS, : : Respondents : MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW . February 8, 2020. Patricia Rorrer is as guilty as sin, and she needs to stay right where shes at. What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. I finally had to stop reading this stupid article. Patricia made daily phone calls every day but made no calls at all the day before, of and after Joannes murder as she was traveling and knew her phone could track her location. What has that to do with the point youre trying to make? Reasonable Doubt: Season 5, Episode 7 - Rotten Tomatoes Susan Wright is out of prison after killing her husband in TX. And because some of Patricias advocates have suggested Andrew Katrinak had a motive for murder, I checked into whether he had a life insurance payout to gain upon Joanns demise. It was winter which are cold in PA and would slow down decomposition and minimize insect activity although you are correct about the rodentswhy were there none? Today, Patricia Lynne Rorrer resides in State Correctional Institute at Muncy, a medium and maximum security facility that has the highest rate of cancer of all prisons in Pennsylvania, according to a story from northcentralpa.com. And the fact that Patricia called Andrew even after he married someone else didnt mean she was still carrying a torch for him, according to one of her friends. Andy did end up moving to Colorado with her and the last time I checked, they were still together. But then again I havent actually SEEN the evidence. Irelands husband buried it in the yard because he didnt feel comfortable with a firearm inside, she said. If I see anything that offers a differing opinion or is inaccurate, I think its entirely fair I should say my piece. I noticed quite a few errors myself. While not a guilt sceptic, I suggest this was either ill-conceived expression or an expression of misguided mindset for its not for the defendant (albeit now convict) to convince of innocence but for prosecution to convince of guilt (and per appeal, that guilt is safe rather than innocence unproven). Pat had a string of bad relationships in her past and was not happy. Remember, killers have the advantage over investigators. When Andy Katrinak comes home to find his wife and infant son gone, he summons the police and tells them he believes they have been abducted, and he suspects his ex-girlfriend Patty Rorrer might be involved. This is untrue. I THINK THEY SHOULD REOPEN THIS CASE AND LOOK AT THE HUSBAND JUST SAYING BUT IN MY HEART AND MIND FROM READING ALL THE NOTES AND STUFF PATRICA IS NOT GUILTY AND THEY NEED TO SET HER FREE. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. Animals would have for sure. PDF In the United States District Court for The Eastern District of Any true crime fan should know the crazy history of these magic boxes. This woman was obsessed and jealous. Your assertion that most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense is in fact nonsense the reality is that most people are easily fooled by these biased documentaries who then feel its okay to spout their tripe as if its the gospel. Its never been made clear. Patricia is not guilty of this horrible crime she was railroaded by her ex and the cops. (Media sources vary as to whether she actually worked at the stable or just rented a stall there for her own horse.). Just one example. The evidence was all there. And about the only thing from your comment with which I can agree, is you saying thats not proof theyre right in reference to their verdict. Joann was fun, likable, beautiful, always happy, said her sister-in-law Cindy Wiard. "Wrong Man" Patricia Rorrer: The Hang Up (TV Episode 2020) - IMDb And the obvious answer is Ill tell you why (which really is common knowledge). Those that think that Patricia is innocent are simply groping at straws. I didnt read anything in this article that convinced me I didnt like that the lab had a bad rep and I do agree the police lie and frame people sometimes so I cant say 100% she did it or not. And the point the hair in her hand wasnt tested was because they didnt need it since they had the killer shame on everyone who went along with that. There is pendency of DNA investigation for Routier. Watching Reasonable Doubt right now hope they also find that she did it. If I knew I was going to get caught, I never would have brought you into this world, the arresting officers testified they heard her say to Nicole. That documentary points out that, despite the bodies of the two victims supposedly being exposed for several months, their condition remained relatively undisturbed by weather or animal activity. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Its an opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. So we can just pretend that everyone is honest all of the time? They are total bs. The obvious, if moot, response to this is to observe that her conviction wasnt based on inaccurate documentaries but on trial. Did they ever determine cause of death in the baby? That poor child who grew up with no mom for absolutely no reason. This time, not surprisingly, the FBI did achieve a match. They need to test that hair from Joanns hand and also that broken fingernail. How is it that these women are paroled? Nope. She was born on Jan. 24, 1964, in eastern Pennsylvania and moved back and forth between there and Davidson County, North Carolina. The fact that there was a broken fingernail with skin attached to it found on her clothingand wasnt Patricias. Some lawyers call microscopic hair analysis junk science that today wouldnt qualify as evidence in a trial like Rorrers.
Oridget Digital Timer Manual T319,
What Happened To Will And Deanna's Son,
No Operations Defined In Spec Swagger Python,
How To Clean Gecko Poop Off Walls,
When Do Daphne And Simon Kiss,
Articles P
patricia rorrer update 2020